Home » Who are your Neighbors in the Link Building World
Did you always want to know what effect co-citations have? And do you know all about your neighborhood, the good as well as the bad one? Be aware that your environment can either help you or affect you negatively. Today it’s all about good co-citations.
Link Buildiung is a common SEO practice
Link building is a technique that has always been used to push sites up in the Google rankings. It became even more important after Google and other search engines introduced link based algorithms that led to the fact that link building became the most important method to improve search engine rankings for a site.
Since then Google has become more and more sophisticated and has improved to better evaluate link growth and link quality in order to fight against automated link spam. A lot of new quality signals have been put in place in the last years that show if a site really deserves ranking high in their results. Here co-citations play a crucial role and therefore this is a principle that every SEO should understand and practice.
Social media is becoming increasingly important in SEO
In fact the concept of co-citation is not too well known in the SEO industry yet. At the moment social media, twitter and nofollow linking leads to so many new trends in the industry that some professionals tend to forget about the fundamental principles SEO. Besides all the new methods that can be employed these fundamentals of SEO shouldn’t be neglected!
The concept of co-citation is nothing new and not rocket-science. The term co-citation refers to other citations on a page, meaning links that go out to other sites that are on the same page with links to your site. What you need to make sure is that all of those sources are “good” sources i.e. references to external sites that increase the value of the page and support the topic. By doing this they establish themselves as a good neighborhood to your link signaling to Google that your site is good and relevant too.
To understand the concept of co-citation in SEO also the classical definition of co-citation in literature should be looked at. The picture below describes the simple definition of the term co-citation as found on wikipedia, but you may want to look here for a better definition of the term.
Bibliographic Co-Citation is a popular similarity measure used to establish a subject similarity between two items.
This is how co-citations work
The co-citations on a site will make the search engine understand what sites your site is similar to. Looking at the pictures above you can see that the four sites A, B, C and D are related to each other just because the sites 1, 2 and 3 are linking to them. It is crucial for every SEO to understand why this is important.
The term “bad neighborhood” is frequently used in the SEO industry. It refers to the situation that occurs when you don’t pay attention to having good co-citations. If you are in a bad neighborhood apparently what you did is that you put a link to your site on a page linking out to the “bad guys” on the web, which doesn’t have to be malware or virus sites necessarily.
The “bad guys” that put you in a bad neighborhood are sites that suffer from one or all of the following problems:
You are still wondering what a bad neighborhood is? The picture below is a classic example of it.
A bad co-citation can lead to a bad neighborhood
It shows some links in a paid link ad box, which is already bad by itself. As you can see there is a sunglasses link among many other casino and pharmacy links. Even if the site owner or the PageRank toolbar of that page tells you that a link there is desirable: it is not!
Don’t buy a link there because some metric tells you to – it won’t do your site good!
You should pay attention to the neighborhood of every single link you have to your website. No matter if you employ link builders or have a company taking care of link building for you they have to be aware of this matter. They shouldn’t be distracted by old school SEO metrics like PageRank or Cache date that are no sufficient indicators for link quality as I already explained in a previous article, but pay attention to what really matters: the neighborhood in which you place your links!
Not paying attention to this issue can have severe effects: you may be deemed one of the “bad guys” by Google and thereby lose rankings as well as trust by Google.
Just like there are bad neighborhoods you can also find good neighborhoods on the web, i.e. sites where you can place your links together with good co-citations linking to valuable resources. Google will soon believe that you are a quality resource too if you are constantly mentioned together with other sites that are of high quality. Every link counts as a vote for your site, which is also true for the other sites that are linked with you.
In SEO a bad neighborhood can be a problem
After reading the article so far you might be wondering if you have employed the right link building practices with regard to co-citations up to now. How can you find out if you are in a good neighborhood?
To diagnose your neighborhood Google has a special command with which you can find sites similar to your website. You should be aware that this command has also been crippled just like many others e.g. the popular BackLink command. Therefore, you will only be presented with a random sample, however, this will already give you some quick and useful insights.
All you need to do is to type related:yourdomain.com into the Google search box and Google will return you with sites it finds to be similar, i.e. sites it finds co-cited with your site.
Find out in which neighborhood your site is
Another way to find out about your neighborhood is to simply click the “similar” link that shows up directly in the SERP results. I did the test for the website of my company CEMPER.COM and got nice list of popular guys in link building and SEO. Many of them are tutors, partners or even friends. Some of the results for similar websites to cemper.com are WeBuildPages.com, SEObook.com, Stuntdubl, David Naylor, ShoeMoney, the Google webmaster tools, the popular WebmasterWorld forum by Brett Tabke, and even Matt Cutts’ personal blog. Google understands that all of these guys are in the same business of SEO and link building and therefore displays them as being related.
After you have analyzed your co-citation you should make sure that your link builders know how a valuable co-citation looks like, why it is important and most importantly how to find a good citation that you should add to your site.
Everyone who understands the benefits that a link in a good neighborhood can bring to you and has influence on other sites being mentioned with your site will feel the need to try that those sites mentioned together with the own site are killer resources and high quality sites.
Good co-citations lead to good neighborhood
There is no simple right or wrong answer to the question which sites you should use as co-citations. If you are an expert in a certain field, you will know which sources are reputable and valuable.
If you have a website about a financial topic in the US you could add the FDC or a big financial newspaper.
For companies in the SEO industry I would suggest linking Rand Fishkin’s SEOMOZ.org with your site as this is a real quality resource on SEO and link building and has been around for years.
In case you are not an expert simply use your gut feeling to find valuable sites!
Your co-citations, which form your link neighborhood, can be a good tool for ranking higher than your competition. Pay attention to who the pages you have links on link to! Find out if other links on a site where you have a link are in some way related to your industry, your site or a topic you are dealing with! If this is not the case you should ask yourself why there is a link to your site on that page!





Christoph C. Cemper shares his presentation from the...
In this SEO Q&A session, we discuss 5 steps to take...
Link building is a tedious process and its important...
Google has been monitoring personalized search behaviour...
Recent studies show that more money is spent on PPC...
Christoph C. Cemper shares his presentation from the...
In this SEO Q&A session, we discuss 5 steps to take...
Link building is a tedious process and its important...
Your writing entertains, explains, teaches, and sells?...
As experienced software developer, you help improve...
You are a PHP crack and think you can bring our SaaS...
CEMPER.COM serves international clients who are running...
US: +1 (866) 457-3736
UK: 0800 810 1114
AT: +43 123 66 385
Wagramer Str. 25/3/17/68
Vienna 1220

Frank
September 14, 2009 at 6:43 amHi Cristoph!
I love the training You are providing to me, I’ve never had so much interest in a topic befor. I admit it’s hard for me to follow but if I know myself the way I think I do, at some point in time all this info will hit me like a ton of bricks and the feeling of breaking through a cement wall will come upon me,so keep sending Your training please.
Now! First thing I want to clirify with You, is that my site hosted under the FrankAndMarivicPaul.com is actualy,” a PluginProfit franchise ” is the way I describe it. This site has a LinkMachine and a XML sitemapgenerater pluged into it and I also receive a bunch of prewriten articles that are posted every month related to Home Business Issues which I’m sure SEO’s are linking my site to other Home Business Sites.
Now here’s the thing, although I’m sure the SEO’s are doing a great job at that, I can omly trust them at this point because not only do I not know, or have a clear picture of how this works yet, I lack time to keep an I on it. There’s also the idea that I don’t want my site to be linked only to Home Business pages but by writing articles such as(Online Businesses Build Online Communities) a topic of people pulling together to promote a better lifestyle for one an other as well as a better financial futur,I’m hoping to rank in Online Cummunity pages. This is only one of the examples I write to You about There are others, such as a title like (No Man Is an Island) where the topic is directed more towards trusting the right people to guide you in the right path for those who have dificulty trusting others and never acheiving their goals because of this lack of trust. This also I’m hoping to Rank in “I guess” either Selfhelp or aswell as Community pages. These subjects are important to me because they speak of personal issues for me. Now my Question is Will this work for me? and if not what would You suggest ? This isn’t just about making money for me “although I will take what I get from this” but it’s about taking the traumatic experiences of my life and making a change of direction in order to actualy help others find this new and exciting path I have taken to improve their lives as well. This is my goal this is my dream!
God Bless!
Frank
[Reply]
Steve
September 25, 2009 at 11:05 pmGreat post, It is like moving house, always check the location out and the neighbourhood. Some grat tips for anybody on shared hosting.
[Reply]
Fred Christman
October 9, 2009 at 10:19 amI’m not sure where I am in the 1,2,3,4,A,B,C diagram. At first I thought you were I have to be linked to on some good site along with other good sites, which seems difficult to arrange, but at the end, it seems that I should put links on my site to a collection of good sites. I suppose all and any of that is good. Will affiliate lnks have value. E.g. I make myself affiliate to some similar but old-time top class sites, and put one page pitch and link to them and the same to me on another domain of mine, not on the same server?
Enough! Thanks, you have me thinking.
[Reply]
Ivan | Jobs Blog
November 2, 2009 at 5:36 pmIn a real life example – if you are a startup recruitment agency – should you lik to some 5 to 10 major job boards (in your location / country)?
[Reply]
Christoph C. Cemper
November 3, 2009 at 1:05 am@Ivan – yes – you should!
@Fred – I trouble following your question … but in the example you could be A and the others related to you could be B,C,D
@steve – absolutely!
@frank – while I can’t give detailled advice here the phrase “LinkMachine and a XML sitemapgenerater pluged into it” sounds VERY VERY scary to me.
[Reply]
Rick Glaser
November 5, 2009 at 5:47 amHey Christoph, I really love your post, and knowlege about link building. Not enough people talk about the importance of building trust and continue to target high “pr” pages. You have really offered some great advice to people that do not have the understanding about how algorithms work past 2004.
Thanks, and I will continue to check back and see what other great knowledge you have to offer. Great work!
-Rick Glaser
[Reply]
Cees
November 18, 2009 at 11:04 amThanks for your article. Even for someone new in SEO its very understandable. I am struggling to get some links for a scrapyard business in Spain. I am on my way now.
[Reply]
Barbara Zaccone
December 3, 2009 at 9:02 pmThanks for the article. This is the clearest and most detailed explanation I have seen on “citation building”. Everyone talks about inbound link quality and rank but no one talks much about the neighborhood concept. Most recently I had a prospect in my office who was in the insurance business. He was spending big bucks with an SEO company and was looking to redesign his web site. After runing some SEOMoz reports I found what terrible unrelated places the SEO company placed his site. For example cosmetic surgery. Give me a break.
[Reply]
Simon Davies
March 1, 2010 at 2:03 amI get hundreds of emails a day, so I had all these ones from Cemper in a box. Just ploughing through them now. I read some heavy none fiction books, and this beats anything. This is easy to understand in comparison. I get the good neighbourhood concept right away. This Christopher Cemper is promoted into my top ten cool people on the net.
[Reply]
Paul
August 11, 2010 at 5:45 pmMost companies are just looking to increase the number of links to their website and are not aware quality of neighbourhood.
Chris is clearly passionate about the neighbourhood he’s in…….
[Reply]
Tyler
October 29, 2010 at 3:22 amGreat post! Many webmasters forget to look at the quality of other outgoing links on pages they are trying to get linked from. I have often passed on otherwise great link opportunities because of this.
[Reply]
Alla Goltsman
March 11, 2011 at 3:25 pmHi Cristoph,
I am giving you a lot of credit for speaking about ‘good or bad link neighborhood’. I do not see too many people raising this question. I became aware of this problem as my websites started climbing the PageRank ladder. I starting clicking on the links people leave in comments. What I found out was horrible. There were porno sites, drug promoting sites, totally dead sites, etc. So, my rule is to click on the link people leave in comments. If I am not happy, I delete the comment. That’s how I understood ‘good or bad link neighborhood’ so far.
But this article puts a new twist on the problem for me. The problem is even deeper than I thought about it. I am very grateful to you for putting this new twist into my mind.
Big thumbs up for what you are doing and your website!
[Reply]
Alla Goltsman
March 11, 2011 at 5:01 pmCristoph,
This article uncovered that my website that I am actively working on http://SmallBusinessClicks.biz has no similar sites and returns an error when I put the ‘related:’ query in Google search box.
Now I need to let Google know what my link neighborhood is. If you can give me clue of what is the best and fastest way to do, I would deeply appreciate. Thanks!
[Reply]
michaelah Reply:
March 29th, 2011 at 3:52 pm
Hi Alla,
very often Google does only show a small segment of data,
or as in your case no data at all.
One indication for this could be a bad linking profile, a very new site,
or other things that made Google get unhappy – any of those things apply to you?
Regards Christoph
[Reply]
Austin SEO
March 12, 2011 at 6:58 pmThank you for posting such great content on SEO best practices. I was refereed to your site from a friend at PubCon. Great work. Thanks!
[Reply]
Austin nursery
August 11, 2011 at 5:45 amYou always want to be in the best neighborhood you can. Really good info on this and the co-citations – Thanks!
[Reply]