<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Avoid the Google -50 Penalty</title> <atom:link href="http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure</link> <description>Advanced Link Building and SEO Company</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator> <item><title>By: michaelah</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-865</link> <dc:creator>michaelah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:30:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-865</guid> <description>Hi there!Removing your paid links could be a bad idea, because it provides Google with a pattern they can check. If they suspect your links to be paid and they&#039;re suddenly gone after you&#039;ve been penalized, you give them additional proof.Penalties can have different causes, though. Are you registered with the Google Webmaster Tools? You can sometimes get information in there or at least issue a re-inclusion request once you removed the causes of your penalty.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there!</p><p>Removing your paid links could be a bad idea, because it provides Google with a pattern they can check. If they suspect your links to be paid and they&#8217;re suddenly gone after you&#8217;ve been penalized, you give them additional proof.</p><p>Penalties can have different causes, though. Are you registered with the Google Webmaster Tools? You can sometimes get information in there or at least issue a re-inclusion request once you removed the causes of your penalty.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: demon chat</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-864</link> <dc:creator>demon chat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:42:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-864</guid> <description>Woke up this morning with the minus 50 penalty i am going to take you advice on board.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woke up this morning with the minus 50 penalty i am going to take you advice on board.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gordon McNevin</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-863</link> <dc:creator>Gordon McNevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-863</guid> <description>Great video! I had no idea internal linking could be a factor in a penalty. I&#039;m currently trying to get out of a penalty myself. I&#039;m actually going round and asking for paid links to be removed. Do you think this will work?Thanks again!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video! I had no idea internal linking could be a factor in a penalty. I&#8217;m currently trying to get out of a penalty myself. I&#8217;m actually going round and asking for paid links to be removed. Do you think this will work?</p><p>Thanks again!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Saurav Rimal</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-861</link> <dc:creator>Saurav Rimal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 12:46:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-861</guid> <description>People using article spinning tools must be scratching their hair out at the moment.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People using article spinning tools must be scratching their hair out at the moment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-847</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:59:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-847</guid> <description>I think I&#039;ve just had a few of my sites hit with this penalty at once - one of the sites must have triggered the filter and the others were on the same adsense account so they got lumped in with them as well.Definitely makes it a bit tougher to work out where the problem might be...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve just had a few of my sites hit with this penalty at once &#8211; one of the sites must have triggered the filter and the others were on the same adsense account so they got lumped in with them as well.</p><p>Definitely makes it a bit tougher to work out where the problem might be&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: michaelah</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-844</link> <dc:creator>michaelah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:13:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-844</guid> <description>Hi Randal!
Do you know which keywords drive the most traffic on Google? If so, see which position you have for them. A +50-Penalty would mean that you dropped by five pages, so it should be easy to detect if you&#039;ve been on the first or second page of a Google SERP and now you&#039;re on the fifth or sixth!
As for finding out what you did wrong exactly - it might be anchor text variation, it might also be too many links from too strong or weak sites - you might want to look at our Link Research Tools, specifically the Competitive Landscape Analyzer, which compares your link profile to those of your competitors&#039;.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkresearchtools.com/tools/cla/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.linkresearchtools.com/tools/cla/&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Randal!<br
/> Do you know which keywords drive the most traffic on Google? If so, see which position you have for them. A +50-Penalty would mean that you dropped by five pages, so it should be easy to detect if you&#8217;ve been on the first or second page of a Google SERP and now you&#8217;re on the fifth or sixth!<br
/> As for finding out what you did wrong exactly &#8211; it might be anchor text variation, it might also be too many links from too strong or weak sites &#8211; you might want to look at our Link Research Tools, specifically the Competitive Landscape Analyzer, which compares your link profile to those of your competitors&#8217;.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.linkresearchtools.com/tools/cla/" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkresearchtools.com/tools/cla/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Randal@Top Windows 7 Themes</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-843</link> <dc:creator>Randal@Top Windows 7 Themes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:31:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-843</guid> <description>How can I be sure that I have received exactly Google - 50 penalty? My traffic went down so fast recently and I dont know why exactly. I am not quite sure that i have over optimized my anchor texts. Great post by the way</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I be sure that I have received exactly Google &#8211; 50 penalty? My traffic went down so fast recently and I dont know why exactly. I am not quite sure that i have over optimized my anchor texts. Great post by the way</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hoan</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-755</link> <dc:creator>Hoan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 21:03:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-755</guid> <description>Thanks for your sharing, it helps me a lot.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your sharing, it helps me a lot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob McCance</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-656</link> <dc:creator>Rob McCance</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 03:00:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-656</guid> <description>This stuff makes me nervous. I can&#039;t imagine painstakingly climbing the rankings for a couple of years only to get whacked back by FIFTY spots.Brutal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stuff makes me nervous. I can&#8217;t imagine painstakingly climbing the rankings for a couple of years only to get whacked back by FIFTY spots.</p><p>Brutal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: seomoves</title><link>http://www.cemper.com/seo-knowhow/google-minus-50-penalty-cure#comment-650</link> <dc:creator>seomoves</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:53:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cemper.com/?p=1746#comment-650</guid> <description>Seems to me that Google has stepped up keyword specific penalties recently. Anyone else seeing an serious increase in keyword specific penalties?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that Google has stepped up keyword specific penalties recently. Anyone else seeing an serious increase in keyword specific penalties?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc

Served from: www.cemper.com @ 2012-02-10 21:03:17 -->
